Canyon Guard is actively monitoring legal action stopping the gondola from progressing. While litigation is not the answer to resolving traffic in Little Cottonwood Canyon, we understand that effort is an essential step in working towards real transportation solutions for the canyon. Simultaneously, we are working with elected officials and the public to develop and implement more sensible solutions to canyon traffic.
Litigation Timeline
UDOT Conducts an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Little Cottonwood Canyon
Spring 2018 – Spring 2023
Under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), UDOT was required to conduct a detailed evaluation of how their proposed transportation project would affect the natural and human environment. This multi-year process included the release of Draft and Final EIS documents, during which public comments were solicited and documented.
UDOT Publishes the Record of Decision (ROD)
July 2023
UDOT completes the EIS process by issuing the ROD, where they formally selected "Phased Implementation of Gondola B" as their preferred solution.
Three Lawsuits are Filed
December 2023
Three separate lawsuits were filed in response to UDOT’s decision. While each were unique, the three suits similarly alleged that UDOT inadequately conducted the NEPA review.
The Lawsuits are Consolidated
April 17, 2024
The plaintiffs successfully moved to consolidate the three lawsuits due to their overlapping legal claims and factual basis. The consolidation is beneficial because “it will conserve judicial resources and reduce the risk of contradictory rulings”.
UDOT Submits the Administrative Record (AR)
September 2024
UDOT submitted the Administrative Record—a collection of over 35,000 documents—to the plaintiffs and the court. The AR is intended to reflect all materials UDOT considered in making its decision to pursue the gondola.
Plaintiffs' Teams Analyze and Challenge the AR
Fall 2024 – June 2025
Because the judge can only review the Administrative Record to evaluate the legality of UDOT’s decision, it is critical that the AR be complete and accurate. Plaintiffs studied the AR to identify any omissions.
Canyon Guard organized a dedicated team of volunteers and interns to assist the plaintiffs in reviewing the AR. Since Fall 2024, the plaintiffs have been engaged in ongoing efforts to compel UDOT to supplement the AR with documents we believe exist but were not initially included.
The Court Will Determine if the AR is Complete
June 12, 2025 - Present
On June 12, 2025, Judge Tena Campbell heard oral arguments from the plaintiffs' and UDOT's attorneys over the completeness of the AR.
Currently, Judge Campbell is deciding if the AR is complete or not. When she makes a decision she will notify the plaintiffs and UDOT.